[Mip6-firewall] [MEXT] New versions (-04) of the firewall vendor and admin drafts

[Gabor.Bajko at nokia.com]

Folks,

Shouldn't we provide an answer to the questions below?

Noriaki is right, there are some aspects of MIP6 and Firewalls in those
two documents he mentions, but those address different issues:

RFC4890 only addresses the filtering of ICMP6 messages within MIP6,
while RFC4942 addresses the security aspects of MIP6 (Suresh is a
co-author in this, probably can explain better why there is no overlap
with that document).

- Gabor

  >-----Original Message-----
  >From: mext-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:mext-bounces at ietf.org] 
  >On Behalf Of ext Noriaki TAKAMIYA
  >Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 7:06 PM
  >To: suresh.krishnan at ericsson.com
  >Cc: mext at ietf.org
  >Subject: Re: [MEXT] New versions (-04) of the firewall 
  >vendor and admin drafts
  >
  >Hi,
  >
  >>> Wed, 07 May 2008 14:09:53 -0400
  >>> [Subject: [MEXT] New versions (-04) of the firewall 
  >vendor and admin 
  >>> drafts] Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan at ericsson.com> wrote...
  >
  >> Hi Folks,
  >>    We have submitted new versions of the firewall vendor 
  >guidelines 
  >> and the administrator guidelines drafts to address the 
  >issues raised 
  >> during the earlier reviews and during the IETF71 mext 
  >meeting. Please 
  >> take a look and let us know if you have any comments or issues.
  >
  >  I'v not been the meeting for a long time, and if it is 
  >insufficient,
  >  correct me.
  >
  >  Firewall configuration for MIPv6 is also described in RFC4890 and
  >  RFC4942.
  >
  >  How about refer to these document?
  >
  >  example)
  >  4.3.2 in RFC4890
  >  2.1.2, 2.1.15  in RFC4942
  >
  >  Regareds,
  >
  >--
  >Noriaki TAKAMIYA
  >_______________________________________________
  >MEXT mailing list
  >MEXT at ietf.org
  >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
  >